This is an old blog I wrote last year (sometime) while in the midst of my now husband's nasty 1 1/2 year divorce. I was very angry and, you may be able to tell if I keep blogging, I'm extremely witty and sarcastic when I'm angry, so I thought I'd share it with everyone. I originally had this blog on myspace and removed it because the subject of the blog went whining and bitching to her ex mother-in-law, my future (and now current) mother-in-law about how mean this "little girl" is to her! So for the sake of my MIL's ears I deleted them. Now that there's no danger of the bitching, thanks to the subject's actions of the past couple of years, I feel no need to hide my good writing away from the world :)
Friday, June 20, 2008..
|
| Stupid People I have a critical question to ask pretty much anyone with a brain stem (sorry aborted babies). Which should come first, getting a new tattoo or piercing, or buying your children clothes? Let me recap. Not so long ago, we requested that The-Bitch-Who-Shall-Not-Be-Named send some nice clothes with the kids for them to wear to my friend Krystal's wedding (which was beautiful). She sent none, claiming that "what clothes they have are in that bag." So we found them some respectable clothes, which included me taking Carissa to Walmart for a pretty purple shirt to match her skirt for the wedding. This said shirt got sent home with the kids by accident that weekend. Now there was an event we were going to tonight (Friday the 20th) for someone I care a lot for. This said One-Who-Shall-Not-Be-Named was invited to this ceremony (which is fine). The only reason I mention this is to prove that she indeed knew where the kids were headed after we picked them up tonight. Joshua came out of the house wearing basketball shorts and a top to match. Carissa, a pair of bluejean shorts and a very stained t-shirt. Carissa told me "sorry Tiff, but mommy wouldn't let me wear the shirt you bought me." Instead, she opted to send her in a horribly stained shirt, as was every shirt in their clothes bag for the weekend. Now rolling with the punches, I picked out an outfit from the bag for Joshua to wear. The only pants sent with them? All were too tight on Joshua, they were hurting his stomach. It was after this that I discovered that all of Crissy's shirts were stained just like the one she had on. So we had to take another trip home before leaving for this event to get them some respectable clothes to wear, some that FIT and some that were STAIN-FREE. This detour, as which I'm sure the whole purpose was, almost made us late. Now since this custody battle has been going on (since July 16th of 2007), this particular individual has been receiving child support from Richard EVERY WEEK. Money that is specifically for things the children need (IE food, CLOTHING, water, etc). Also, since this individual has been receiving child support, she has gotten two tattoos, as I'm sure many people know are not exactly cheap. One on ..9/29/07.. and one on ..05/04/08... My question to normal, free-thinking, common sense possessing people is this: Which should come first? |
0 comments:
Post a Comment